Maple vs mathematica reddit. Came to college and they use Maple.
Maple vs mathematica reddit. I note that there was a thread is this sub some years ago asking whether it was worth it. All posts and comments should be directly related to mathematics, including topics related to the practice, profession and community of mathematics. If you’re still in college, your school should have a license. I'll use mathematica more more "hard-core" mathematics problems, I wouldn't ever make a significant bunch of code in maple. So look what you want more handy to do codes or using the more built-in functions. If you could share with me the reasons you choose Sage over Mathematica I would appreciate it. This subreddit is for discussion of mathematics. Is there any interesting usage of sageMath software for pure math? Hello, sageMath. Or are you looking to enter numerical algorithms for optimization? For the former Maple and Mathematica are both suitable and it really comes down to your preference. I use Mathematica whenever I need to solve a nontrivial integral, differential equations, partial differential equations and difference equations. 110 votes, 59 comments. Also Mathematica 8 has an intelligent input mode based on the same tech that Maple vs. Maple and Mathematica emerged at the same time, but Mathematica clearly won out as the preferred product. It had over Maple (years ago, I don't know current Maple version) a much cleaner, mostly functional, language that allowed easily to work on lists and nested structures with a compact (sometimes obscure) syntax. All posts and comments should be… Other things is being easy to write code and in it Mathematica is better than Maple and Matlab lies between them. Mathematica: What's the Difference? Maple and Mathematica are both advanced computational software, but Maple prioritizes symbolic mathematics and exact solutions, whereas Mathematica emphasizes a balance between numerical and symbolic computations. Sometimes, you have an equation that's very challenging to isolate to a particular variable, and for that, you want to use something like Maple rather than MatLab. You may be asked to use Mathematica / Matlab / Maple for particular courses or projects and when you do, use the computer lab. g. Given advanced in e. Notably, in its tour page, It mentions SageMath can be used to study elementary and advanced, pure and applied mathematics. Matlab, Mathematica, and Mathcad are all very useful tool for solving any mathematical problems, I have no experience in maple, but the listed computational programs are the essence of chemical engineering, which happens to be very heavy in physics and mathematics. I have a (recreational) interest in maths and am considering getting the Mathematica Home edition. I think it's mostly a question of personal taste. In chemoinformatics and molecular modeling, Python . Some features of Maple : It makes use of Matrix manipulation tools along with Mathematica's polynomial factoring algorithm is known to be at least fifteen years behind the state of the art, and things that Maple will factor in seconds will go away (literally) forever in Mathematica. At my institute most people use Mathematica. Jul 15, 2025 · 1. Now, comparing Mathematica, Maple and Matlab, for me these are in different realms of computational expertise. Some points to consider: Open source or not is not really an issue for me at the moment I can program in python (maybe a pro for Sage?) What do you guys think will be the future of CAS software? Open source like SageMath or closed like Mathematica? I am asking because I am still undecided on which one I should learn to benefit me 10 - 20 years from now. For that, you would want Matlab or C/++ as u/a_bourne mentioned. And gnu R is worth knowing just for the fancy plots. May 18, 2024 · Maple is a comprehensive mathematics software system that specializes in symbolic computation. Some professors (especially in Canada?) teach Maple to their students because that's what they learned. I discovered sageMath, A software similar in spirit to Mathematica, Maple, and Matlab. Personally, I would advise Mathematica above Maple. 2. It's far easier to learn and has an excellent Help Manual that will walk you through every facet of every command. Arriving at a new university and seeing that they don't have mathematica on license, but they do have maple, means that for all these silly symbolic things I now need to learn a new set of code. However, I also found out that there are many great applications used for mathematical calculations and illustrations. 7M subscribers in the math community. Among the different computer algebra systems available, Mathematica and Maple are widely used for symbolic advanced computations, numerical calculations, and calculations related to theoretical physics and mathematics. I personally always worked with Maple - less so with Mathematica - and liked it. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Python can be used off-the-shelf to do most things in this domain (and beyond, in other non-chemistry related tasks), but cutting edge packages for chemometrics are often released in MATLAB and R. It uses a strong algebraic system to compute built-in Maple libraries. And between the two, Maple has a much more intuitive process. It is really one of the best tools I've found to solve such problems symbolically (and that is perhaps the most important keyword which distinguishes Mathematica and Maple from Matlab). Pure-Math. Thanks. I used both several years ago, then my choice was Mathematica even if they could do almost the same things. Just learning one will be helpful in general, which one is better will be marginal by comparison Edit: I personally prefer doing small things in maple because it speaks English, mathematica is probably better for big applications but is harder to use before you're fluent. For data processing / analysis, it can do a lot - like with most math-related fields. I find maple is better for on-the-fly, quick stuff that you want to edit in a kind of what-you-see-is-what-you-get manner. [General/Software] Mathematica vs Maple vs Sage vs R, which one should I learn first? Hey, I want to learn to use a mathematical computation package and was wondering which one of these is more recommended. Mathematica is excellent for symbolic manipulation (I prefer it to Maple, having used both for 4 years each), but is definitely not the tool you want to use for intensive numerical computation. This serves as the best tool for 2D image processing. I guess this sub will skew heavily towards it I was taught Mathematica in high school for four years. Compare Maple and Mathematica head-to-head across pricing, user satisfaction, and features, using data from actual users. Mathematica, Maple, Matlab, Which application should I use? Hi there, I'm currently a student majoring in CS. Came to college and they use Maple. Learning SYMPY is is a great skill if you plan on having a career that involves a significant amount of mathematics. Having your equations look pretty is a very high price to pay for loosing all of your work when Matlab / Mathematica whatever proprietary solution you pick decides to rev and lose backward compatibility. For he latter you should rather consider a "real Mathematica has a really broad set of tools (built in functions) for computing many kinds of things. Mathematica, on the other hand, is a powerful computational software that integrates symbolic, numerical, and graphical computations Feb 9, 2011 · Discussion on the usage and recommendations of MATLAB, Mathcad, Maple, and Mathematica in industry and academia. I was introduced to use Maple in my Calculus class. Functionally for me I use WA for any computation that is just 1 line and Mathematica (or sage or maple etc) for anything longer. I use maple, mathematica and python, each for different things. See comments for applications. Maple : A Maple is a software tool that is used to perform mathematical calculations, which includes numeric and symbolic computations. Between Mathematica and Maple: Mathematica is more principled, but I find Maple's user interface more convenient (at least when it is not horribly buggy). NumPy/SciPy is it still worth it? I suspect it is, if nothing else for the access to the various datasets and wonderful visualisation. However, programs like Mathematica and Maple are useful when you want to manipulate equations symbolically. In chemometrics, which is a branch of analytical chemistry dealing with experimental design and statistical calibrations, MATLAB and R are popular. The wise engineer would know one of matlab/python and one of mathcad/mathematica/maple and use the right one for the task at hand. The automotive simulation toolboxes are great. One could argue that between those, Matlab is the one that actually handles numerical computations effectively. It certainly saved me countless hours during my physics degree. It is widely used in education, research, and engineering for solving mathematical problems, performing algebraic manipulations, and visualizing mathematical concepts. syh tf 8vzn odv hxvij gwmjxnzg tmf9 7lugc t0k8 vo2